14
« on: 10 Mar 25, 10:29 am »
May I start by saying that I am in broad agreement with your comments when it comes to personal preference within the build, especially when there is no “performance advantage gain”. Surely the desire to build the kart of your dreams must prevail.
This leads me on to MY dilemma, which is fast approaching and could literally hit the “build buffers” in a dramatic way if I don’t get it right. I refer of course to my up-and-coming build, the Panhard Razar and its unique steering system.
My take on the discussions, centred on the committees’ objections on the grounds of cost, so where does this leave me and my personal safety.
I have NO engineering knowledge or skills yet if I were to follow the “cost restrictions”, plus rely on cheap untested and inappropriate parts cobbled together to create this rather complicated steering system, “no disrespect but I don’t think a spinning table top server has been certified by the Department of Transport as safe to be used for steering a motor vehicle,” then what is the answer. Do tell me as I would like to drive this kart safe in the knowledge that I will walk away from it in one piece and at the moment a spinning table top doesn’t cut it.
In short, I may have to incur a few hundred pounds in order to have this steering mechanism manufactured but I am reluctant to commit such funds, which are for the benefit of my safety, if the committee is going to tell me I can’t or should not have spent that some of money, meaning the build is not viable.
Have I, and some others, got the wrong end of the stick here when it comes to what one wants to build, within limits and is the limit COST over SAFTEY and PREFERENCE?