Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Jagodo

Pages: [1] 2
1
Events / Re: AIRFIELD ACES NEW YEAR SHAKEDOWN 2026
« on: 07 Dec 25, 05:02 pm »
Please count me in. 100%

2
Events / Re: 31st MAY to 1st JUNE - NATIONAL KIT CAR SHOW
« on: 26 May 25, 12:02 pm »
Hi,

I was at Middlezoy this weekend.

I would like to attend on the Saturday. I will be bringing and driving Terry Sander's Stutz.

Regards,
James

3
CK register / Re: Race Number Register
« on: 21 May 25, 10:12 pm »
Could I have No 57 for my "1927 Hanomag 2/10" James Doulton which is still under construction?
Could I also register No 51 for "Morgan Zoyland Special" in Ian McCabe's name - it's a super low 3 wheeler that I am driving for Ian at Warag, this weekend?

4
Events / Re: 8th MARCH 25 - CKGB AGM
« on: 20 Feb 25, 11:01 pm »
Hi, I will be coming (in person). 100%, final answer, lock it in.

5
Build journals / Re: Hanomag 2/10
« on: 23 Dec 24, 05:42 pm »
I've finally got my garage sorted out so that I can get on with the CK build whenever I have a bit of time. I've started welding up my frame. I have done the welds on the top and bottom surfaces so far but not done the vertical welds yet. Is it always true that the welded structure deviates from the drawings? It does with me. I won't show any close-ups of the welds, particularly the first two!

So far, I've only done the outside of the frame. Then I need to add in the cross brace that goes just behind the driver, and the extra longitudinal tubes in the rear. Then there will be some cockpit framework and a roll bar.

I shan't get any opportunity to fiddle with any of that until next year and then there will be all of my Christmas presents to play with too.

6
Build journals / Re: Hanomag 2/10
« on: 26 Oct 24, 12:16 am »
Work on my cyclekart has been very slow. I have been working on getting my controller, battery, motor and necessary ancillaries connected up. The minimum battery/motor/controller connections were a bit of a practical challenge, rather than a logical challenge. Making the heavy cabling for 100+ Amps is very different to what I've done before.

But the biggest problem has been understanding the other peripherals, what the connections are and how they are used, and importantly, which are unnecessary. The circuit diagrams and manuals are literal conversions of the Chinese words which don't make much sense, e.g. the electric door lock, the turn handle, and many more. Also the way that the sentence are structured are completely different too, so the meaning is often completely different from what you might guess.

After months of toiling over the circuit and the set-up method, I finally connected it up into what should be a minimal working system and tried it out on the bench. The motor turned a few times and then stopped. The controller suggested that my freshly charged battery was too low voltage and refused to work with it. I popped it back on the charger which charged it for about 10 seconds before declaring it full. But when I tried it with the motor again it continued to declare it too low. After all of the struggle I had had, that was the last straw - so I bought another controller that seems to be fairly popular in the electric moped/motorbike community.

My new controller is a FarDriver ND72300. FarDriver make a large range of controllers from 1kW to 40kW and they can even be used in heavy quadricycles and light cars. It is much more complicated than my 'old' controller and the documentation is better, but still not enough on its own. Luckily there are helpful expert user videos and moped forums that have filled in a lot of the gaps. It has cruise-control, regenerative braking, short-term boost (using field weakening for higher speeds), a CANBUS interface, bluetooth, a phone app for set up and diagnostics, including graphs and recordings. The app allows you to define a hundred or so parameters to customise the profile of the functions at different speeds. It really is the business!

I bought a matching display and compatible handlebar throttle unit with built-in switches to make my initial experiments easier. This helped but didn't make it trouble free - some pins in the connectors for the throttle and switch were not clipped into the connectors and had fallen out, and one connector had the pins in but in the wrong positions. These took a few hours to sort because the cable colours were also different to the ones from the controller!

Eventually I got it all together and it worked a little bit but then it too complained about the battery voltage. But with the phone app connected I was able to see that the controller was measuring the battery at 37V, not the 53V that I had measured after charging. A quick check with a multimeter showed that the controller was right and that one cell was showing 0.3V rather than 3.3V like the rest. I disassembled the battery, replaced that cell with a new one and suddenly I had a completely working system. What a relief! What a joy! Now all I need is the rest of the cyclekart, but that doesn't represent the same level of technical risk - it is a well trodden path.

I do wonder if I could get the 'old' controller to work now, but I've moved on. I am looking forward to tweeking the regen to give the feel of engine braking and having a Boost button for overtaking, like having KERS. But that'll have to wait until I've got a complete cyclekart.

7
In my view, the drive-train should not be constrained except for the ban on having manual gear changes. I think that swapping the chain and sprockets to get different overall ratios for different tracks or different events is all part of the fun. If a competition day has different races, say a straight-line drag race, a sprint, an endurance race and a top speed race, I see no problem with people swapping final drive ratios between events, especially if they do not have a variable transmission.

As I'm building an electric CK (albeit a very slow build) then I am more concerned about being limited to 3kW (i.e. 4 HP) when other CK's are allowed 10 bhp (7.5kW) with variomatic drive that keeps them in their power band. There is no way that a 3kW system could compete, even though it might manage a peak of 5kW for 5-10 seconds when cold. Possibly a case for different classes?

8
Build journals / Re: Hanomag 2/10
« on: 05 May 24, 12:00 am »
After a busy time with new solar cells and subsequent roof problems, I finally got a chance to get back to CK things today, and gave myself a bit of a scare with a short circuit on my battery.

I had assembled all of the cells previously and connected all of the sense wires for the BMS but not connected up the BMS. So I finally connected the BMS and struggled with the Bluetooth BMS app to configure the parameters for the battery. I couldn't get it to balance the cells. The English in the instructions is pretty poor, so too is the English in the app, for example dialogue boxes have two buttons labelled "Disagree" and "Determine" which I assume mean "Cancel" and "Okay".  I can't make any sense of some of the error messages at all.

So I decided to use the touch screen that I recently bought. Unfortunately, the wiring for the display, which should only use the CAN/RS485 connection, actually uses two pins of the UART connection that the bluetooth transmitter uses, so I can only use one interface or the other, not both. And they both seem to have different functionality. Grr!

Some of the instructions seemed to suggest that the BMS doesn't perform all of its operations until the battery is fully charged for the first time, so I decided to do that with my new 15A charger. The charger worked a treat and only took half an hour to complete the charging. However, the BMS still would not balance the cells. The charging curve of the cells is very flat until the cells are 90% to 95% charged but then it rises quite sharply. This means that the voltage difference between the cells increases as the most charged ones approach 100%. So, with the recalcitrant BMS not helping me, I used the cell voltage display as a guide and used a small power supply to charge each cell individually. After spending and hour or so doing that, I had reduced the difference between the cells to about 50mV but I wasn't happy with that and it kept diverging as it settled after charging. So I decided to disassemble the battery and to wire all of the cells in parallel and charge them all together to 3.6V.

The disassembly process is a little bit tricky because you can blow up the voltage sensors in the BMS if you disconnect the sense wires wrongly. I managed that and was starting to disassemble the cells, removing the +ve connection of the battery pack, when I dropped a washer and inadvertently let go of one of the loose joining busbars which naturally decided that it wanted to swing down and touch the -ve terminal of the battery. There was a flash and I suddenly had droplets of molten metal bouncing on my dining table and onto the floor. Luckily the busbar was loose and didn't make a good connection but there were a couple of further sparks before I managed to get the offending busbar away by using the allen key that I had been using moments before.

As far as I can tell, the only lasting damage is the the burn marks on the dining table and some material deposited on one cell's terminal. That cell was warm to the touch but all of the cells seem happy - they are rated at 150A, so easily sufficient to blow holes in thin metal like the busbar without ill effects. So just a nasty scare.

I shall be re-configuring the battery structure to ensure that there is always an insulation barrier between cell terminals so that I can't repeat the experience. Meanwhile, the battery is fully disassembled ready to be connected in parallel tomorrow.



9
Build journals / Re: Hanomag 2/10
« on: 16 Apr 24, 12:16 am »
Thanks Bob.

My BMS does coulomb counting. I believe that it detects the upsweep on the first charge and uses that to set the SOC to 100%. Then it uses the discharge current, along with the capacity that I tell it that the battery has, to determine the SOC after that. It may well recalibrate itself on the next charge if it gets to that same point in the curve (but I expect that it won't have time to get there in between driving sessions at an event).

The BMS has a bluetooth connection to a phone or tablet, which is fine for monitoring the charging process but not much good when driving in bright sunshine and not good for a phone when it is raining. Plus I have a folding phone which doesn't mount well as a display.

The BMS also has a RS485 serial interface, so I might be able to get (or make) a display but that'll take a bit of investigation. I'd quite like to make a display so that I could have a nice analogue meter with a 1920's style pointer and a brass surround, but have it driven by modern electronics and a stepper motor. That may be a winter project if the CK works well enough to warrant it.

In the immediate future, I'm going to make up a 16s 1p battery which will allow me to get to a working CK. It will also give me time to charge the remaining cells and to monitor their discharge (in some manner to be determined) over a long period of time (1-2 months say) so that I can pair them in such a way as to make the new bigger battery as uniform as possible. If that process is successful then it might be good to repeat that each winter and to rely on the BMS to minimise or manage the divergence in the short term. I'm not in any hurry to make that 2nd battery pack because I will need to get a second BMS to go in it, which is more investment which I don't want to risk until the CK is proven. I'm still learning a lot and I realise that I have much more to learn.

As you suggest, I'd expect the in-service charging during an event to be whenever I wasn't driving the CK and only for as long as I had between races or as long as it takes to get to 90-95% full. With a small capacity battery, I won't want to go out on track with less than about 80% charge. Note - It may be that charging will have to be done out of the CK. This might be in a specially designated area, in the case of using a portable generator, or in a nearby building in the case of using mains power. I would probably only give it a full recharge over lunch, if there is a break, and after I get home after the event.

10
Tech Forum / Re: Electric drivetrain options
« on: 14 Apr 24, 12:00 pm »
I have not been able to get past 2 major drawbacks.
1. The cost of the drive system will be at least £1000, more than my entire kart.
2. How will I recharge the battery fast enough to make a day’s racing achievable.
1) The cost...
I have spent £370 on a 3kW motor and a matching controller through Alibaba from a company called Wuxi Helanda Mechanical & Electrical. That was the total cost including delivery, import duty and various other charges, but I was very pleased with this price. It is intended for a large 3 wheeled transport that is common in China but it remains to be seen if this is suitable for a cyclekart.

I have currently spent about £450 on the batteries, which was £300 for the cells, £130 for a BMS. I got the cells 'new second hand' for a very good price because they were surplus from another project and had cost over £1,000 new in 2020. I noticed that similar cells are available through AliExpress with 60% off making them only a little higher than the price I paid.

I have also bought a 15A charger specifically for my battery configuration from AliExpress for £110.

So I am standing at £930. I am actually going to split my cells to make 2 batteries, so I'll need another BMS which will bring the total to just over £1,000. But I recognise that the implementation is completely unproven and I might well end up reworking it (i.e. spending more money).

2) By my estimates, a typical 10 minute racing session will use about 12Ah at 48V. My cells are 15Ah (Headway 40152's), so I can get away with using a single string of 16 cells. Note: the cells can happily delivery 150A, so I don't need to parallel them.

As I have 56 cells in total, I am intending to make a second battery that uses 32 cells in a 16s2p arrangement, so that I can take part in longer events (~20 mins). I intend to make these batteries interchangeable (although I doubt it would ever be as fast as a F1 pitstop). So with my 15A charger running full time charging one of the batteries, I can drive for 10 mins per hour all day. I'd expect to arrive with both batteries charged and to always swap the batteries, to keep the charger running. However, I might move up to a higher power charger (I've seen a 30A one) because even the single string can be charged at more than 15A.

That all assumes that power is available and that I am allowed to use it. If not, and for places that are off grid, then I think I'll need a 3KVA petrol generator - so about another £300 into the mix. I might claim that the generator is to cover home power cuts, as we have had 2 in the last year, so I can put that expense in a different budget!

A higher power charger and a generator are going to push the cost of going electric close to £2,000. But I'm not going to invest any more for now until I know 1) that the cyclekart works, and 2) that a rule change won't make my hardware obsolete.

11
Build journals / Re: Hanomag 2/10
« on: 13 Apr 24, 01:12 pm »
Could you use the 48v battery from an ebike?
To save this thread turning into a discussion on batteries in general, I've put my answer on https://cyclekartsgb.createaforum.com/tech-forum/electric-drivetrain-options/17/

12
Tech Forum / Re: Electric drivetrain options
« on: 13 Apr 24, 01:07 pm »
I had a question about batteries on my build thread. I think it would fit better here.
Could you use the 48v battery from an ebike?
That depends on 3 main things: The current limit of the pack, the total energy capacity of the pack, and safety.
Note: I assume the question is about road-legal ebikes, off-road bikes are different as there are no rules and no power restrictions and may well be user designed.

Current Limit
========
UK CycleKarts are limited to 3kW continuous/ 5kW peak (which typically means for 10 seconds before the motor overheats).  Road legal ebikes are limited to 250W continuous. So we are using 12x the power. This means that road legal ebike battery packs are not intended for the sort of currents that a CK will draw. 5kW peak is the CK motor mechanical output but its electrical input will depend on the motor efficiency, if this is 75% then the battery needs to provide 6.7kW, which is about 140A at 48V. Whether that will quickly destroy the cells in an ebike battery depends on the particular cells used and the number of cells in parallel in the pack.

Battery Capacity
==========
Also a CK battery will typically need to last for a minimum of 10 mins of racing (but some events may be longer, e.g. 24 minutes so a battery swap might be needed). During a race, drivers are usually on full power for about 60-75% of the time, so 10 mins of racing is about 7.5 mins on full power. 3kW output means 4kW of electricity which translates to 83A at 48V. This means the pack needs to be able to supply 500Wh before its voltage dips significantly. What fraction of discharge represents a significant drop in voltage will depend on the battery chemistry but it is likely to be between 60 to 80% discharged. So you probably need a nominal capacity of 700-800Wh but more would be better. I don't think that typical ebikes batteries are in this range.

Safety
====
There are many different Lithium chemistries and most of them need special care and some are particularly sensitive to over AND under charging. Under failure conditions they can result in serious fires and explosions. There is also the danger of crash damage causing short circuits, battery rupture etc leading to fires. On a ebike, the rider is likely to be thrown clear in a crash, not so in a cyclekart. Other racing clubs (I'm thinking of the Hacky Racers) have virtually restricted the approved chemistries to only LiFePO4 by imposing restraints on other types. LiFePO4 is much safer because its electrolyte requires much higher temperatures to ignite and generally needs an existing fire to get it going. LiFePO4 also has other safety benefits when handling the cells and when abused. It also has a long life, long shelf life and it maintains its voltage longer under discharge. But LiFePO4 has significantly lower capacity for a given volume or a given weight, which means that it is probably not used in ebikes - but I've not checked.

Note: this is my view, others might disagree...

13
Tech Forum / Re: Electric drivetrain options
« on: 13 Apr 24, 12:40 pm »
I have had a change of heart with regard to battery sourcing. I still think that second hand ones from cars is a good source but only if you can find detailed information about the cells themselves. There is quite a lot of information available for the Nissan Leaf cells so you know what you are getting. The VW ones are much more difficult to find out about, for example I think that the ID batteries are pouch cells and are difficult/impossible to separate but the eGolf ones are separate prismatics.

Luckily for me, a great solution fell into my lap when Thamesmud messaged me about some cells he had spare from a project that he had completed, in which he had changed the design to use different batteries from the ones he'd originally bought. His spare ones (and his upgrade ones) were LiFePO4 chemistry which he had selected for safety reasons. That sent me scurrying to my book "DIY Lithium Batteries - How To Build Your Own Battery Packs" by Micah Toll which also stressed the overwhelming safety advantages of this chemistry. Most DIYers are building packs for ebikes that they can jump off if things turn nasty but when I've squeezed my old creaking frame into my cyclekart then I'd need an ejector seat to get me out quickly if the things went wrong. So safety is an issue.

Ian F also drew my attention to the Hacky Racers, who have a lot more experience with batteries, and they impose extra constraints on using anything other than LiFePO4, these constraints also add weight which erodes the advantages of the alternatives. I'm guessing that it would be difficult for CKGB to justify being more relaxed than the Hacky Racers when our cyclekarts are heavier and faster, so I would expect that we will follow their lead in the following years.

Also LiFePO4 is a reliable long lasting chemistry with cells being pretty robust to abuse and deep discharge without a big dent in their overall recharge cycle life, which is already one of the best. The discharge curve is remarkably flat over the range 5% to 85% discharged, so the cyclekart performance won't start dropping quickly throughout a race and more of the nominal capacity is actually useable.

14
Build journals / Re: Hanomag 2/10
« on: 10 Apr 24, 04:05 pm »
An alternative is to parallel a group of cells and charge to 3.5v, this way they are all guaranteed to be the same voltage, with a series arrangement the overall voltage is not necessarily divided equally across the cells. 
The cells I have fall into two groups - those that were partially charged and were resting at 3.33V and some which were resting at 3.1V. What I was doing was charging 8 of the cells that were low until they were closer to the partially charged ones BEFORE pairing them to make a 16s2p pack. Whilst they were charging I was manually checking their voltages to see that there were no outliers. What I didn't want to do was to pair a 3.3V with a 3.1V because, with a the cell resistance of about 8 mOhm,  I'd get a current of 25A between them. I weld 16 gauge steel at those currents so I wanted to reduce the difference as a first step.

It is rather a hit and miss affair trying to charge them to get a particular resting voltage as the voltage whilst charging is quite different to the resting voltage. I studied the published charging and discharging curves for these cells so that I could estimate their different SOC and then timed the charging of these cells based on that. That came out pretty close and I got no sparks when pairing cells. This is all experimental for now and I expect to fiddle around with them again before the final battery build.

The BMS that I've bought does balancing and I expect to use that capability but it may not be the best way to do it. However, my BMS only works with 16 cells in series, which I can't charge with my small 30V power supply (new charger is on order, hopefully arriving tomorrow). In use, I intend to avoid letting the cells get below the 80% discharged state so I would not expect to get into serious cell difference issues in the short term. (Do advise me if you disagree)

My one worry in this is with paired cells: If I make a single series chain of 16 cells then the BMS can completely monitor each cell, but when each cell is actually a pair of cells in parallel then one weak one is more difficult to detect. So I think it may be prudent to regularly (but hopefully not too frequently) disassemble the pack and check all of the cells individually.

For now, I just want to get a pack together to test out the motor and controller.

15
Build journals / Re: Hanomag 2/10
« on: 08 Apr 24, 12:02 am »
I met Thamesmud and his wife on Tuesday evening to collect the LiFePO4 cells. We had a meal and a good cyclekart chat. They had come over to this side of the country for a short break, which was fortunate timing for me.

So now I have almost all of the components needed to make up my basic electrical system, I'm just waiting for a few little items for the wiring - solder tags, heavy duty cable and terminals etc. Hopefully, I might get a chance to connect everything up and see that the motor turns (or not) in the next week.

I haven't settled how many of the 56 cells I am going to use in my battery pack. The simple solution that I had intended was to use 48 to make three parallel strings of 16 cells giving me a 45Ah battery which would give me about 30-35 minutes of racing. That would be draining it down to 20% charged. It would probably take a little over an hour to charge which could be a real nuisance. Depending on the event, there might be time between heats/races to partially recharge and to avoid a full recharge.

But I am now considering making 3 smaller batteries of 16 cells each. The smaller batteries would provide about 10 minutes of racing each and I could swap them each heat/session and have two on charge while I'm driving with the third. The smaller battery would experience a greater voltage drop under load, which would reduce its power output a little (about 7%) but the cyclekart and driver would be 15kg lighter (also about 7%) so the performance might be identical. The drawback of smaller batteries is that they would limit me to 10 minutes of racing.

A third option would be to make 2 batteries - a small one with 16 cells and a medium one with 32 cells. They would give 10 and 20 minutes of racing, respectively. This would allow some flexibility for different types of events and would be a compromise.

For today, I favour the two battery solution. I expect that will change just as soon as I get the cyclekart together and actually drive it and see how it goes and how long the batteries actually last. Everything might change and need redesign - but that's what winter is for, right?

Charging a group of cells to get them to the same voltage as the others [ Guests cannot view attachments ] This is prior to assembling them into a battery with a BMS. I need them to be at the same voltage in order to pair them up in parallel.

This is a trial assembly of a 32 cell battery. [ Guests cannot view attachments ] I don't like the physical shape as it will be difficult to fit into the cyclekart, so I will have to take it all apart again. I think that half that height (and twice the depth) would fit under my seat and leave space in the engine compartment for a fake petrol engine.

Pages: [1] 2