Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Ade Colmar

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
Tech Forum / Re: Jackshaft sprocket mounting
« on: 07 Dec 25, 11:55 am »
In an attempt to keep things simple with bearings and sprockets I used 30mm layshaft and hollow axle.  The layshaft is a short length of 30mm bright bar with a keyway cut in.  The big sprockets are 420 and range between 37 to 43 to change the gearing.  The small jackshaft sprocket is a split 428 item with 21 teeth (the smallest in 30mm) from OKE Karts.  Although 420 and 428 chain are the same pitch, the roller width and diameter are slightly larger for the 428.  So that I can run with 420 chain throughout, I reduced the width of the 428 21 tooth sprocket by about 1mm. 

It all works fine, but I would like to find a better solution using a matched sprocket smaller than the current 21 tooth item.

2
A very helpful overview, Jim.

At the last event, I ran with both the standard Vevor TAV clutch and then swopped for the Juggernaut clutch.  Based on what others had said, I was expecting (and got) faster acceleration.  However, what I did not expect was the change in the effective final drive ratio.  From rough calculations using GPS speed and a digital rev counter, I seemed to get at least 10% overdrive from the standard Vevor clutch but still using the same belt I was getting 1:1 drive on the juggernaut at max speed.

I mention it here because if builders are struggling to get their final drive gearing up to or beyond 7:1, fitting a juggernaut has the additional benefit of giving you a good 10% on your final drive ratio.  (That is 10% more revs for the same speed, so better employing the headroom gained by removing the governor and adding various tuning mods.)

3
Tech Forum / Re: Advice on valve springs please
« on: 22 Oct 25, 05:38 pm »
Thanks Ian and Jim.  GXtuning springs are £7.99 a pair, but £9 for the cheapest posting!

I did a bit of measurement today using my Heath Robinson test equipment shown in the photos below and the better of the springs I already had :)

The inlet valve is moved 5.25mm by the rocker arm.  I guess in principle, it should take around 12lb force to move the valve that distance with the standard spring fitted and 18lb force with the KKC Honda heavy duty (34mm) spring fitted.  In practice the measurements were greater.  Rather than get distracted by that I concentrated on the relative difference which was 25% and so a little less than expected.

Once fitted I warmed up the engine and then slowly increased the revs until I heard the clattering of the valves again.  This now happens at 5,400-5,500rpm.  Previously with the standard valves fitted the clattering started at just over 5,000rpm.  So a useful increase, but not good enough in the long term.

I guess I will have to try the GXtuning valve springs at some point!

4
Tech Forum / Re: Advice on valve springs please
« on: 21 Oct 25, 07:36 pm »
Thanks for the feedback and apologies for not spotting the earlier similar query from Scotty.  So, two more pairs of springs arrived today from KKC and I now have four quite different springs including the original from the engine (a Maxspeedingrods GXR212).  See the attached photos.

Original engine spring is 30mm free length, 1.8mm wire diameter and five turns.
KKC Heavy duty Honda GX140/160/200 spring is 34mm free length, 1.9mm wire diameter and 7 turns
KKC aftermarket GX160 G4 spring is 26mm free length, 2.2mm wire diameter and 5.7 turns
Chinese heavy duty GX200 is 27mm free length, 2.4mm wire diameter and five turns

I'm surprised to find such variation in free length. I don't know if this is by design or a nightmare of quality control! The compressed length of any valve spring when installed in the engine is 22mm.  This leaves me concerned that the 26mm Gx160 G4 spring would have marginal pre-compression to ensure the collet cannot come lose under the dynamic loads.  By contrast, the HD GX140/160/200 spring seems unnecessarily long at 34mm.  Although it is made of thicker wire than the original spring, the two extra turn make it soft again.  My best guess that it might be around 20% stiffer than the original, which doesn't seem enough.  The GX160 G4 spring seems at least 50% stiffer, which is about right.  However, as mentioned earlier, it is worrying short.

On balance, the safest bet out of this bunch is probably the long HD GX140/160/200 spring.  I'll give it a try and see what the engine sounds like.  Any other suggestions welcome :)

5
Tech Forum / Advice on valve springs please
« on: 21 Oct 25, 10:19 am »
I ordered a pair of '18lb' valve springs off eBay (from China) and when they arrived they were the same size as the originals, but massively stronger.  From a bit of research it looks like the standard GX200 springs are around 11lb so on a relative basis I would guess the springs I bought are 35-40lb.  If I fitted them they would sap power and accelerate wear on the valve train, so they are going in the bin! 

So I am wondering where I can source springs with a more reliable rating?  I don't intend to build I high revving engine, but I can hear the valves start to clatter at just beyond 5,000rpm.

6
Build journals / Re: "The Rat" finished. 1928 BAC Special
« on: 21 Oct 25, 10:09 am »
How wonderful!  I love it!  I'm also relieved to see all the hot or spinning bits are safely covered!   :)

7
Tech Forum / Re: Lessons Learned - Safety
« on: 16 Oct 25, 11:50 am »
Good to know you are back in the workshop Granville, and thanks for posting about the cause of your tumble.  I trust you are recovering well.  As a generalisation, any component whose sole failure can result in major loss of control needs careful thought (single failure vulnerability).   It is not easy to build redundancy into your Panhard rod set-up, so your Kia solution (which could be described as 'massive and passive') is always a safe bet.  This allows for the potential erosion of strength though fatigue and general wear and tear.  An M8 bolt might be theoretically strong enough when new, but I think you proved that after two years it was terminally weakened! That is regardless of whether the bolt failed and caused you accident, or failed as a result of the tumble.

8
Some wonderful action photos!   :)  Thanks Andy for organising a very enjoyable day at the best kart track I've ever seen.

Ade

9
Hi Andy, kart 88 final installment of £30 paid.
Ade

10
Build journals / Re: 1936 Riley IFS
« on: 31 Aug 25, 09:08 am »
If you bought the same eBay £45 steering rack as I did, you might be interested in this modification. 

I was a little dismayed to see how much slack there was between the rack and pinion, mainly due to the plastic housing and lack of rear bearing.  When you take the cover off (see first pic) it almost looks as if there was meant to be a bearing there, but was forgotten!  When I test drove my cyclekart, the slack in the steering wasn't that noticeable, but due to the plastic housing, I felt it would wear rapidly and only get worse. 

I was about to order a better quality part when I realised I had left over bearings from my wheels.  They measure 12mm ID x 37mm OD and the housing is 36.5mm ID and the boss on the back of the pinion is 10mm OD.  So with a slice of 12mm OD, 1mm wall thickness tubing and a bit of fettling on the bearing outer race (angle grinder) I had a perfect fit.  What a difference! Plus, I now have confidence the steering rack will not wear quickly.

11
Build journals / Re: 1936 Riley IFS
« on: 29 Aug 25, 11:58 am »
Well, that is the chassis painted along lots of bits and pieces.  However, no sooner had I finished than I decided more needed to be welded on! I'm sure plenty us have done the same.  Ah, the smell of burning paint!

In my case it is quite a big bit that I have welded on.  I'm afraid the Baron's big roll at Oulton Park has spooked me a little and the only way I could manage my mind was to do something.  So the end result is the modest roll hoop shown in the photo below.  Retro fitting a roll hoop is not easy and the end result is flawed from a design perspective.  However, my logic is that it only needs to be a little stronger than my neck!

Now that is welded on I can finish the chassis painting and get on with bonding and rivetting the aluminium panels to the chassis.  :)

12
Camping for me on the Sunday night, please  :)

Ade

13
Tech Forum / Re: Petrol vaporisation and overheating
« on: 21 Aug 25, 09:40 am »
Thanks for the tip, it sounds like a simple and effective solution.  BTW, what size of Nibbi carb did you buy?  From what I've learnt to date, they seem to be a reliable upgrade.

14
For sale and wanted / Re: Steel fine perforated mesh
« on: 08 Aug 25, 01:54 pm »
Jay, if no one else has already dived in, I'll take the mesh.  We can sort it at Whilton Mill.
Ade

15
Build journals / Re: 1936 Riley IFS
« on: 07 Aug 25, 12:25 pm »
It has been a while!  Like many I started out with the best of intentions to chart the progress of my cyclekart.  However, I have spent more time in the workshop or events than at my laptop! 

Last week was great fun as I was able to give my rolling chassis some testing around the garden.  As you can see from the photo my grandson joined in!  The testing gave me some confidence in work I have done so far.  Given that the front suspension on the inspiration car was quite unusual for the day, it was especially useful to get a confirmation that this was working out in cyclekart form. 

The next stage is a bit of a comedown.  It is now dismantled down to the the basic skeletal spaceframe for painting.  And I hate painting! :(

From here on in, I will aim to post as I reassemble the rolling chassis and add the bodywork.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5